Inside NASA's Last Moon Mission

On December 7, 1972, NASA launched Apollo 17, a lunar mission crewed by Eugene Cernan, Ronald Evans, and Harrison Schmitt. It would be the last time humans traveled beyond low Earth orbit, the last time man landed on another celestial body, and the last time man went to the moon. The Last Steps uses rare, heart-pounding footage and audio to retrace the record-setting mission. A film by Todd Douglas Miller.
This is a Great Big Film -- one of our tales of pioneers, dreamers, and innovators so extraordinary, we had to go deeper to connect to the full scope of the story. Come with us to the cutting edge of achievement.
SUBSCRIBE: goo.gl/vR6Acb
Follow us behind the scenes on Instagram: goo.gl/2KABeX
Make our acquaintance on Facebook: goo.gl/Vn0XIZ
Give us a shout on Twitter: goo.gl/sY1GLY
Come hang with us on Vimeo: goo.gl/T0OzjV
Visit our world directly: www.greatbigstory.com

Σχόλια 

  1. Alieni al

    Alieni al

    Πριν 22 ώρες

    Barbona

  2. Alieni al

    Alieni al

    Πριν 22 ώρες

    Zazaker

  3. Alieni al

    Alieni al

    Πριν 22 ώρες

    Ku jan yjet mashtrusa badagxhinj komunista

  4. Jonathan Galabo

    Jonathan Galabo

    Πριν ημέρα

    What it it exactly the orange thing they saw in the moon? Its look like a metal thing. So the real deal here is NASA is covering something about that last mission or they Covering something to us. They Cut the film.

  5. 张林

    张林

    Πριν ημέρα

    Whether he landed on the moon or not, both China and Russia know that he can say yes or no, depending on these two countries.

  6. khalid edris

    khalid edris

    Πριν ημέρα

    man dose moon have day time ? haha

  7. W.S K.E

    W.S K.E

    Πριν 2 ημέρες

    FAKE AS F__K!!!

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      Why?

  8. W.S K.E

    W.S K.E

    Πριν 2 ημέρες

    So FAKE!!! You would have to be a absolute dunce to think this CGI fakery is real, moon travel never happened! Geocentric for thev win.

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      Which part is fake, and why?

  9. גלעד עמית

    גלעד עמית

    Πριν 2 ημέρες

    No wind on the moon

  10. antilou

    antilou

    Πριν 3 ημέρες

    FOR EVERYBODY SAYING WHY DIDNT THEY GO BACK AND THEY WERE TOLD NOT TO GO BACK no, thats just a ton of bullshit. Theres literally nothing interesting on the moon, They got everything they wanted in those trips, Why waste resources and money to go back for literally no reason?

  11. bashpr0mpt

    bashpr0mpt

    Πριν 3 ημέρες

    Not only did you never go back but for almost twenty years you couldn't even service your own space station. Lucky for you corporations that refuse to be diversity hire work for the dole establishments like NASA has become are picking up where NASA refused to continue to work. And for the first time in history NASA's budget was increased in response by President Trump. The first time, ever. The budget has been reduced every single budget. But you get a businessman in and suddenly you realise it's worth pursuing - like everyone doesn't already know that. But unfortunately NASA squandered it by hiring another 150,000 people of 'diverse' backgrounds rather than qualified people.

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      What did NASA sqander money on?

  12. King GLOXINIA

    King GLOXINIA

    Πριν 6 ημέρες

    So many astronauts and people spend their time and lives devoting to land on the moon just to have people that did their so called “research “ after watching a 5 min GRgone video and saying it was fake

    • sci_pain3

      sci_pain3

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      i know, it’s honestly sad

  13. Ian McNinch

    Ian McNinch

    Πριν 6 ημέρες

    i feel like we sort of hit a pause with space travel since then, or at least a big slowdown. well atleast there has been stuff like the I.S.S. and mars rovers and voyager and hubble, but still. So im pretty exited about Artemis, i hope it doesn't get delayed into like the 2030's, And i hope im alive when we send people to mars (im 16 right now so its pretty likely)

  14. Amber Galyean

    Amber Galyean

    Πριν 7 ημέρες

    Did anyone hear the astronaut at around 7:30 say this was the first time man has been on another planet ? That's not the words but I forgot but listen. Can't believe they didn't edit this out.

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 5 ημέρες

      ??? I don't hear anyone say that. Did you make that up?

  15. Ryan Williams

    Ryan Williams

    Πριν 7 ημέρες

    Why haven't we been back in 4o years? What are they hiding from us?

    • EnderCreep72

      EnderCreep72

      Πριν 7 ημέρες

      because NASA didn't have the funding they used to, during the Apollo era they had about 4.5% of the national budet, and as of 2015 have 0.5%.

  16. Sweet Music Entertainment & Records

    Sweet Music Entertainment & Records

    Πριν 8 ημέρες

    It's an honour to watch this

  17. Lechner Sanchez

    Lechner Sanchez

    Πριν 8 ημέρες

    I enyoy every second in this video

  18. Gerardo Sabillon

    Gerardo Sabillon

    Πριν 9 ημέρες

    Mi dream is go to the sun one day

  19. Biff Tadrickson

    Biff Tadrickson

    Πριν 10 ημέρες

    Takes a special breed to be an Astronaut........... spawn

  20. richard acevedo

    richard acevedo

    Πριν 10 ημέρες

    I left Guatemala at 19 after attending the military academy. Then I got my engineering BS and MS degrees from USC. Subsequently, I became a member of the engine development team for the X-33 vehicle, at Rocketdyne. I also worked in the Atlas and the Delta ICBM propulsion systems. The jewell in the crown was my working as a member of the Space Shuttle Main Engine development team. It was the rolls-royce of engines. This checked the box of my wish to work in aerospace. Actually, it partly fulfilled my childhood dream of becoming an astronaut. Had I know as a child that Neil Armstrong was a boiler but attended USC for grad school I would have gone bunkers. After 8 years, I moved on. The US needs to encourage our kids to study engineering and science to keep the edge.

  21. marubeni

    marubeni

    Πριν 13 ημέρες

    why in 30 years don t heave a satellite around the moon.....and 4k picture from dark side when sun is from back.....it so fuckin simple......

    • RobloxOhYeah

      RobloxOhYeah

      Πριν 9 ημέρες

      funding problems

    • Asterius

      Asterius

      Πριν 11 ημέρες

      even china already has a satelite there dumbass google before opening your stupid mouth

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 12 ημέρες

      We have *_BOTH_* of those things! Did you even look?? lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov www.nesdis.noaa.gov/content/dscovr-deep-space-climate-observatory

  22. Danial Abuzar

    Danial Abuzar

    Πριν 14 ημέρες

    Naa, put millions of dollars in it.what you brought astronauts : rock

  23. Danny daniels

    Danny daniels

    Πριν 14 ημέρες

    I would be shitting bricks on re-entry . 26,000 mph

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 10 ημέρες

      That's the speed in orbit of Earth. As soon as you enter the upper atmosphere, that speed bleeds off real fast, with the friction from the air - hence the glowing-red-hot entry shield. A bit like a car doing 100 mph (160 kph) and turning off the engine - it slows down pretty fast. Losing speed isn't difficult. The hard bit is gaining speed - hence the enormous first-stage rocket.

  24. Booty Smell A Lil

    Booty Smell A Lil

    Πριν 15 ημέρες

    So y'all telling me you landed for the first and last time and it's not fake? Cap.

    • Booty Smell A Lil

      Booty Smell A Lil

      Πριν 10 ημέρες

      @ann onn ight coo

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 10 ημέρες

      No, they landed six times.

  25. khalid edris

    khalid edris

    Πριν 15 ημέρες

    really fake because of there is no star's {hahahahahah}

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 14 ημέρες

      Can you see stars in the daytime? They're standing in bright sunshine.

  26. wmfwarx

    wmfwarx

    Πριν 16 ημέρες

    Lets go back to the moon, shoot everything in 4K and shut those flat earthers mouth for good!! Oh wait, they'll just claim it's CGI again sigh*

    • wmfwarx

      wmfwarx

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      @W.S K.E sure mate

    • W.S K.E

      W.S K.E

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      that would be awesome but it will never happen! Moon travel is FAKE NEWS!!

  27. Liangh El crak

    Liangh El crak

    Πριν 16 ημέρες

    No entendí nada

  28. Matthew A

    Matthew A

    Πριν 19 ημέρες

    “It’s not the end, it truly is the beginning” Man we need to go back there... or somewhere else🤩

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      @W.S K.E Why dd you delete your reply? You said, " W.S K.E 1 hour ago @ann onn I will bet you $10k it never happens, are we on? " Did you figure out why it was so stupid? OK, so, this "god". Do you have any evidence of it? Please, tell me. If it exists, I want to know. It seems to me that it's just silly superstitious nonsense - like witchcraft and fortune-telling, But I am open-minded. Are you? There is the same amount of evidence of y9ur God as there is of flat Earth. Or a Moon-landing hoax. None. Why do you believe in that specific God, but do not believe in Zeus or Vishnu or Ra or Thor? Do you accept that there is just as much evidence for those - ie none at all? So can you explain why you chose your specific God from the thousands postulated over the years?

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      @W.S K.E You bet it will NEVER happen? When will you pay out? Do you have trouble thinking?

    • W.S K.E

      W.S K.E

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      it is all CGI fantasy, God is real!

    • W.S K.E

      W.S K.E

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      @ann onn I will bet you $10k it never happens, are we on?

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 10 ημέρες

      Please look up "NASA Artemis". They're going back, in 2024. This time, to stay.

  29. Silvia Sil

    Silvia Sil

    Πριν 19 ημέρες

    Espectacular las imágenes !!!!

  30. likith polapola

    likith polapola

    Πριν 21 ημέρα

    Still flat earthers says earth is flat

  31. Dar Eurecial

    Dar Eurecial

    Πριν 21 ημέρα

    Maybe it's too late for me to appreciated everything they thus,I am A Filipino one of the proudest Human being,to see the outside World.And to Witness How beautiful the moon is. Proud to the Apollo17.. Maybe one them are dead already.. I am very thankful,to all the scientest,who discover All that thing's and especially to The Astrnouts,Cause they are a Hero Already.

  32. KADUM PABIN.

    KADUM PABIN.

    Πριν 22 ημέρες

    My childhood dream was to be an astronaut,,,,but now i am an civil engineer😭

  33. GameTomCat

    GameTomCat

    Πριν 22 ημέρες

    Who’s here rewatching everything now that they’re done?

  34. Attack Titan

    Attack Titan

    Πριν μήνα

    This is just the beginning.

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 26 ημέρες

      *Fuck yeah*

  35. T Piz

    T Piz

    Πριν μήνα

    At 10 min mark. If that made it to the moon and up again, you must be really gullable...and SURELY earth can't look that big when it's over 200,000 kms or miles....com on man. That's just to start with.

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 29 ημέρες

      @ann onn Exactly this! The moon is really much smaller than you think! The moon will be full i 1 week, @T Piz, be sure to go out & look! And really, is that the sort of mistake NASA would make? Really?

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      *@T Piz* Go outside tonight, and look at how tiny the Moon is. It takes up less than half a degree of your view. You can cover it up with your outstretched thumb. People often think the Moon is bigger than that, because they're used to seeing zoomed-in cropped pictures. Really - go outside and check. Will you do that, and let me know? I doubt it, because you sound like a conspiracy theorist - so I guess you'll ignore the actual evidence, and just change the subject or run away, like all the others have done.

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν μήνα

      What's wrong with it? Looks right to me.

  36. Igor Vasilievich

    Igor Vasilievich

    Πριν μήνα

    5.35 this is Gemeni's landing on Earth, not Apollo's departure to the Moon

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν 24 ημέρες

      @Igor Vasilievich Sorry, can't deal with insane people like you. I am not even reading your reply. If you think you know more than the entire planet's rocket engineers about rocketry, you publish in science journals. If you think you know more about lunar geology than the entire planet's geologists, you publish in science journals. Only insane crackpots (like you) think GRgone is a science journal. Now, go see a doctor. You need one badly.

    • Igor Vasilievich

      Igor Vasilievich

      Πριν 24 ημέρες

      @rockethead7 Instead of argumentation - insults. This is a sign of DEGRADATION and TOTAL LACK OF ARGUMENTS. NASA's fake moonstones and rigolite were discovered back in 1970, as soon as the Soviet station Luna-16 brought the first samples of regolith. It was then that serious differences between the Soviet and American soil were revealed. Found fakes of TRACKS from alpha particles, a discrepancy in chemical composition. The absence of a film of atomic iron detected by the Soviet station. I'm not even talking about the elementary comparison of ALBEDO (light reflectance). The samples of the USSR fully corresponded to the optical indicators of the Moon, and the American ones corresponded to the TERRESTRIAL ROCKS. The Focus was shown to the USA using SERVERS with soil analyzers. The drone reported on the radio the composition of the soil, but with very low accuracy. And NASA issued DIFFERENT samples of earth rocks to different laboratories in the world to expand the range of parameters. It wasn't until 1972 that NASA could repeat the automatic sampling and get some of the REAL LUNAR SOIL at its disposal. Because of the forgeries, the United States passed the Moon Soil Act prohibiting its sale and exploration by private individuals - but it was too late. As for the composition of the REAL LUNAR SOIL, it is rather HOMOGENEOUS and its chemical composition changes little. This was confirmed by Lunokhod-1, which rode on the moon for 11 months and took samples at 10,000 places. By the way, it was the studies of the Soviet regolith that revealed FAKE with the footprints of astronauts on the Moon, since the mechanical properties of Lunar SAND (regolith) and its absence of anomalous adhesion (angle of repose 46-55 degrees) were immediately published. That is, the tracks were received in a studio on Earth on slightly moistened sand, and the mass of astronauts in a spacesuit (35 kg on the Moon) is clearly not enough for such a clear track and such depth, especially since when a 16-ton module lands, all regolith under the apparatus and near it should have been BLOWED with a jet stream from the engine. When there was an opportunity to confirm the reality of the Apollo flight with the help of Lunokhod-2, then NASA slipped the USSR a map of the lunar surface with a wiped-out crevice where Lunokhod-2 fell. NASA's reasoning was completely shattered back in 1970, and NASA's MANNED FLIGHT has never been proven. To prove NASA's MANNED FLIGHT, it was necessary to show something authentic, which cannot be obtained with a UNMANNED FLIGHT on Saturn-1. And such could only be GENUINE STONES from the Moon (which are NOT), a video that proves the physical parameters of the Moon (jumping 2-3 meters in height and 6-10 meters in length) which are also NOT. And the F-1 ENGINE supporting the entire flight, which the USA DOESN'T still have. Discussing NASA FAKES without these key positions is just plain silly. What in general is there to talk about.

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν 24 ημέρες

      @Igor Vasilievich I'm not going to try to explain rocketry to you any further than I have already. If you think you know more than the entire planet's rocket engineers about rocket engineering, PUBLISH YOUR CALCULATIONS IN A SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL, not on GRgone. And, the petrified wood story is pure nonsense. Why would the USA give a moon rock to a 1940s era Prime Minister anyway? It doesn't make any sense. And, the actual Netherlands Apollo samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 were (and still are) safe and sound in their science museum. The petrified wood sample that showed up in the art museum was fake, yes. But, how is that NASA's fault? Why would you think NASA had anything to do with it? That museum doesn't think it came from NASA. That museum acknowledges that they accepted the donation without verifying it, and it was their own mistake. They don't think the samples in their science museum are fake. They know the sample from their art museum is fake, but at no point has anybody ever claimed it was given to them by NASA. I mean, listen to yourself. Listen to how insane you are. An art museum in the Netherlands accepted a fake moon rock as a donation, and did nothing to verify if it was real or not. They kept it in a drawer for 14 years. Then, when they finally put it on display 14 years after it was given to them, it was immediately spotted as a fake. Meanwhile, the rest of the world has had hundreds of these samples on display, and none of those have ever been found to be fake. The Netherlands doesn't think their other samples are fake. Worldwide geologists have analyzed the hundreds of pounds of lunar samples every day, 5 days per week, for 50 years. They continue to do so today. These are analyzed 40 hours per week, and not a single time has any geologist or geology student ever found any of them to be fake. So, what do you have to support your delusions? An art museum in the Netherlands accepted a fake moon rock as a donation, and didn't bother to find out if it was real... and THIS is your evidence against NASA??!?!?!?! Exactly how insane are you? If a museum somewhere in the world accepts a fake Rolex watch as a donation, and doesn't bother to find out if it's real, and puts it on display, and it's found to be a fake... does that mean that ALL Rolex watches are fake??? Is that how this goes, in your mind?? Anyway, I wasn't even going to respond to you again. I only responded because "ann on" didn't seem to understand your reference about the F1 engine. I'm not playing these games with you. You're clearly in need of some serious mental healthcare. I already engage with too many insane people on this topic. You... you're even more insane than most. You truly belong in an institution for the mentally disabled. And, any further interaction with you is a waste of my time.

    • Igor Vasilievich

      Igor Vasilievich

      Πριν 24 ημέρες

      @rockethead7 Apparently you do not understand the essence of the question. When the FIRST stage of Saturn-5 separates, the video shows a speed of 1.3-1.4 km / s instead of NASA's declared 4.2 km / s, and this is 5 seconds AFTER THE CLOUD LAYER PASSED 6-10 km in altitude ---- that is, SATURN-5 IS NOT PHYSICAL COULD EVEN LEAVE A CIRCUM-EARTH ORBIT. How NASA camouflaged the engines from Saturn 1 in the corpus of Saturn 5 is of little interest to me. How they prepared their materials in HOLYWOOD is of little interest to me either. I see a fake in PHOTOS, VIDEO materials, CHILDREN who pose in photos and video sessions of NASA (I recommend calculating the height of the stairs, step steps on Apollo and compare with the growth of Neil Armstrong). I don’t even want to talk about the falsification of Moon stones by METEORITES, pieces of granite after processing them in accelerators, and even a STONE WOOD donated by the USA to the Prime Minister of the NETHERLANDS.

    • Igor Vasilievich

      Igor Vasilievich

      Πριν 24 ημέρες

      @rockethead7 Apparently the language barrier does not allow us to constructively exchange opinions. The F1 itself would be a great engine now. If he existed. NASA then would not have had to use the Russian rockets with the RD-170 RD-176, which have similar thrust characteristics to the F-1 RD-170 (740 tf) on PROTONS, serving the ISS against the F-1 (750-790 tf). NASA was forced to BUY RD-180 from the Russian Federation with a thrust of only 380-420 tf for its missiles. At the moment, Elon Musk, having received a map form from the US government, all previous NASA technologies, as well as all the developments of the Ukrainian NPO YUZHMASH, only took the first step towards creating engines for heavy missiles. But he has not yet come close to the RD-170 engines. The USSR got out of the difficulty by creating MULTI-CHAMBER ENGINE BLOCKS. USA, showing the FOCUS with the LAYOUT of Saturn-5, the descent modules of which, like the first stages, were sent to the Atlantic, and one module was captured by the USSR in 1970 just after the announced launch to the Moon of Apollo 13. For the last 50 years, the United States could well have used ONE F-1 engine with a capacity of 780 tf, if NASA had it. The use of ASSEMBLIES reduces the reliability in the same way as the use of DOUBLE NODES on the ISS reduces the reliability of the station. If the USA could put into orbit the PRESENT and WHOLE ISS weighing 150 tons, then it would really be a NEW BREAKTHROUGH IN SPACE TECHNOLOGY. But in this case, the FOCUS with an empty tank of the second stage, as with the SKYLEB, did not work, and we had to rely on the old SOVIET SPACE TECHNOLOGIES. Since the USA COULD NOT provide ANYTHING NEW AND REVOLUTIONARY in 2000, as well as to repeat the MANNERED FLIGHT TO THE MOON. As for the "evidence" of the flight of astronauts to the moon - they simply DO NOT. And everything that is genuine is quite attainable by UNMANNED AUTOMATONS and radio repeaters.

  37. Igor Vasilievich

    Igor Vasilievich

    Πριν μήνα

    5.35 это посадка Джемени на Землю, а не отлет Аполлона к Луне

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν 24 ημέρες

      @ann onn FYI: "For All Mankind" was also the name of a documentary style video made from clippings of various Apollo missions. I didn't like it. But, a lot of people did. Basically, the idea was to take a bunch of Apollo footage from all of the missions and blend it all together to make one grand hypothetical mission. If someone knew nothing about Apollo, maybe it was a nice thing to watch, because it used the best of footage from each mission and blended it all together into a video that lasted an hour or two. I have it on DVD somewhere in my basement. But, I only watched it once. For me, it was just too distracting to see footage from one mission, then another, then another, back and forth. I'd rather watch actual mission videos by themselves. But, anyway, the point is, I doubt he's referring to the fake "For All Mankind" mini-series. He's probably referring to the older "documentary" style video. (But, it wasn't even a documentary. It was just a bunch of footage from multiple missions plopped into one hypothetical mission.)

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 27 ημέρες

      @Igor Vasilievich I don't know what you are talking about.

    • Igor Vasilievich

      Igor Vasilievich

      Πριν 27 ημέρες

      @ann onn NASA has stated that "For All Humanity" is their SCIENTIFIC DOCUMENTAL film for the 20th anniversary of flights. So NASA is lying

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 28 ημέρες

      "For All Mankind" is a science-fiction TV series. So what?

    • Igor Vasilievich

      Igor Vasilievich

      Πριν 28 ημέρες

      @ann onn It is a pity that in the film "For All MANKIND" these frames are positioned as the departure of Apollo from near-earth orbit to the Moon.

  38. Ronan Brennan

    Ronan Brennan

    Πριν μήνα

    In that moment when you wake up you try to figure out where you are, i wonder did this happen to them

  39. Darkxnvons

    Darkxnvons

    Πριν μήνα

    This is amazing

  40. Faiyaz Ali

    Faiyaz Ali

    Πριν μήνα

    Before we land on the moon we must get high 😜 weed master 👌👌

  41. Sujeet Hansdak

    Sujeet Hansdak

    Πριν μήνα

    If man landed on the moon where are the stars on the sky ...not even a single star appears on the picture thats unbelievable

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      Because you can't see stars in the daytime. They were standing in bright sunlight. One day on the Moon lasts for a month. Look at it. All Apollo missions happened in the daytime. The sky is black because there is no atmosphere. It is not dark. That's why you can see them. Have a bit of a think, eh?

  42. Khurramdon Don

    Khurramdon Don

    Πριν μήνα

    I wanna be an Astronaut when I grow up! 🚀

    • dr obnoxius

      dr obnoxius

      Πριν 27 ημέρες

      @Khurramdon Don bro is a gender neutral term

    • Khurramdon Don

      Khurramdon Don

      Πριν 27 ημέρες

      @dr obnoxius I'm not bro dude

    • dr obnoxius

      dr obnoxius

      Πριν 27 ημέρες

      Follow your dreams bro

  43. kudz Pakaipa

    kudz Pakaipa

    Πριν μήνα

    1. Why havent we gone back in over 70years? 2. Why hasnt anyone else been able to go up there? 3. Did you know the Apollo project cost $30billion in todays dollar. The Shuttle Project which ended 2010, cost a total of $192billion and 20 people dead in launch && re-entry. Why did Shuttle program not attempt to go to the moon? 4. Why was the documentation for flight ops, and other key evidence destroyed? 5. Why cant SpaceX, NASA or any other nation land people on the moon. We can barely make it out of the planet, 95% of space vehicles cannot even land on any surface, and u claim we can land on the moon. Someone help me understand, im just asking thats all.

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν 24 ημέρες

      YOU SAID: "1. Why havent we gone back in over 70years?" == Wrong. It's been 48 years since the last manned moon mission. This isn't a good start for you. You're already off by more than a couple of decades. YOU SAID: "2. Why hasnt anyone else been able to go up there?" == Because no other nation has been willing to spend that kind of money to put a couple of people on the moon. YOU SAID: "3. Did you know the Apollo project cost $30billion in todays dollar." == Wrong. It was around that much money in 1960s and 1970s dollars. Adjusting into today's money, it's more like $150 billion. Once you add in soft costs (tax breaks to contractors, free land given away for stuff used for Apollo, etc.), it's even more. And, once you add international support, it's even more still. The actual costs would be more like $200 or $250 billion in today's dollars. YOU SAID: "The Shuttle Project which ended 2010," == Really? So... what about STS-133/134/135 in 2011? How do you explain those shuttle missions, if the shuttle program ended in the prior year? YOU SAID: "cost a total of $192billion and 20 people dead in launch && re-entry." == Pffttt. 20, huh? Where are you getting the extra 6? Who are they? YOU SAID: "Why did Shuttle program not attempt to go to the moon?" == Is this a joke?? Do you think the shuttle was designed to land on the moon and take off again?? WHAT?!?!?! YOU SAID: "4. Why was the documentation for flight ops, and other key evidence destroyed?" == It wasn't. You don't know what you're talking about. Stop watching conspiracy videos. Good grief. YOU SAID: "5. Why cant SpaceX, NASA or any other nation land people on the moon." == Because the money hasn't been allocated by any nation to put people back on the moon after Apollo. But, in 2019, congress gave Artemis the green light. They ordered a couple more Orion capsules. The astronauts have been named and are in training. They are accelerating the SLS. Bezos is building the landers. We'll see what happens if/when Biden gets in office. Since Apollo ended, every time a democrat has been in office, funding to NASA has been cut (relative to inflation). And, every time a republican has been in office, funding to NASA has been increased (relative to inflation). It looks probable that Biden will take office, and he might kill Artemis in the same fashion that Obama killed Constellation. Who knows? But, as of this moment, Artemis is funded. YOU SAID: "We can barely make it out of the planet" == Why is this relevant? Do you care to make an actual point? YOU SAID: "95% of space vehicles cannot even land on any surface, and u claim we can land on the moon. Someone help me understand, im just asking thats all." == Here's an idea for you... if you just want answers, stop watching conspiracy videos (which is obviously your only source of "knowledge" - don't pretend otherwise). Guess what, conspiracy videos are always wrong. Always.

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      70 years? Check your facts. The last Moon landing was 1972. Do the maths. 1. Money In the 1960s, Americans were terrified when the "commies" launched a satellite - afraid of a nuclear war. They threw money into Apollo to catch up. Almost 5% of the national budget. For every $20 spend, $1 went on Apollo. That's crazy, and not sustainable, so the program got cancelled. Since then, congress has not supported spending $100 billion or more just to land the 13th man on the Moon. It's made more sense to send robotic missions - cheaper and safer. 2. See 1. China doesn't think it's worth $100 billion either. 3. Your numbers are wrong. The Shuttle was not designed to go to the Moon. It's like asking why Ford Motorcars haven't been to the centre of the Earth. 4. It wasn't. Some of the raw data was lost - like, recording what the temperature inside the cabin was, every 10 seconds. Streams of numbers - "Telemetry". 21, 21, 22, 21, 21, 22, 21, 20, 22... hundreds of hours of that kind of data. The _results_ of that data appear in all the reports, which are freely available online to you right now. The raw data isn't important. Those tapes - the media - were expensive, and got over-written. If you think any "key evidence" was destroyed, please give me your proof. But you cannot, because it's just a lazy claim by conspiracy theorists. 5. They're working on it now - but not a pointless few-days trip; future missions will STAY on the Moon, and take us onwards to Mars.

  44. Max Ace

    Max Ace

    Πριν μήνα

    “You guys are NASA sheep! Now let ,e go blindly follow anything a 2000 year old book says”

  45. JakeFels8

    JakeFels8

    Πριν μήνα

    This guy should just move to the moon he seems so happy on the moon

  46. Afua Manko Abedi-Lartey

    Afua Manko Abedi-Lartey

    Πριν μήνα

    i want to be an astronaut it has always be a dream and im a child not an adult,but i never got a like or subscribtion pls give me some but only likes plsssssjust do it on my comment not on my youtube page

  47. Julian Gonzalez

    Julian Gonzalez

    Πριν μήνα

    It's all fake we never landed on the moon why they say they can't go back to the moon that they don't have the technology they had back then now we do got it so what's the problem all you people are in a fairy tale it's time to get to the fiction worry we nerbr went you'll guys see that in time

    • Richard Chicken

      Richard Chicken

      Πριν μήνα

      and you can prove this?

  48. Grep Brywus

    Grep Brywus

    Πριν μήνα

    Typewriters... Polaroid cameras... and walking on the moon... with duct tape. BULLSHIT ! BTW... how did they have conversations without DELAY !?! Again... BULLSHIT !

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      There was a delay. About 240,000 miles at about 670,000,000 mph. The speed of light. Do the maths, it's not hard. It's about 1.25 seconds, each way. Exactly what we see on the footage. Maybe you've seen the edited video, where the delay was cut out? Watch the original. Don't believe stupid conspiracy videos.

  49. Lee Holmes

    Lee Holmes

    Πριν μήνα

    Seeing the earth from space is the most beautiful site personally I would never be bord of ✌👍

    • W.S K.E

      W.S K.E

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      not one(1) real not CGI picture of a round ball earth in existence and no real not CGI pictures of moon travel, go figure?

  50. agapi giapanta

    agapi giapanta

    Πριν μήνα

    I wonder when will I wake up 😂

  51. translucent_rays hanama

    translucent_rays hanama

    Πριν μήνα

    I cant believe your page is being shut down You provide us with beautiful and educational footage. Please come back

  52. Subhan

    Subhan

    Πριν μήνα

    Why do I feel like we can’t pull this off with our technology now

    • Papeda vs Cilung

      Papeda vs Cilung

      Πριν μήνα

      Pembodohan

    • RedbullAddict

      RedbullAddict

      Πριν μήνα

      I'm not sure. we most certainly can, in fact, we could probably go to mars as a one-way mission with our current technology if we wanted to.

  53. Andy Hague

    Andy Hague

    Πριν μήνα

    Its a film set you morons,it so obvious,its all staged.

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      @Andy Hague What fact? Your first post said, "Its a film set you morons,it so obvious,its all staged. " Now you're saying, "look it didnt say it was fake,look yourself". It is hard to understand you. I am not asking you about "plandemic" or flat Earth or JFK or 911 or alien reptiles. This video is about the Moon landings.

    • Andy Hague

      Andy Hague

      Πριν μήνα

      @ann onn are you trolling me and taking the piss i stick by everything i said,fake space,new world order,plannedemic angenda 21,30,50 no virus all about control i stick by everything because these are facts.

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      @Andy Hague You said, "its all staged." Have you changed your mind? I *have* looked. There is *no* evidence it was fake. If you disagree, show me one bit of evidence. Please stop calling me names. That doesn't help anything. What about "NASA", "Nasha" - are you man enough to admit you were wrong about that?

    • Andy Hague

      Andy Hague

      Πριν μήνα

      @ann onn look it didnt say it was fake,look yourself,but we will never agree im awake,your woke,my opinion is my opinion,yours is yours.

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      @Andy Hague "facts are facts" - OK. Please tell me ONE fact that shows it was fake.

  54. Andy Hague

    Andy Hague

    Πριν μήνα

    Absolutely all staged bullshit.

    • Billybob Joe

      Billybob Joe

      Πριν 18 ημέρες

      grgone.info/will/nceRa6eKeMelwI0/b-nteo

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      Oh dear. I'm sorry to hear that your comments are bullshit. I hope you get better.

  55. Flat Earth

    Flat Earth

    Πριν μήνα

    NASA , you are mistaken because the World is flat .

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν μήνα

      Thanks for straightening that out! moron

  56. Kordor kharshandi

    Kordor kharshandi

    Πριν μήνα

    Mih ki riew shemphang na bynta ban iada ia ka pyrthei shihajar nguh

  57. Rohan Barnard

    Rohan Barnard

    Πριν μήνα

    Does anyone know the name of the song used for the intro?

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      It was made for the documentary.

  58. • iiannaaax •

    • iiannaaax •

    Πριν μήνα

    I wanna go to the soon and just float and fly it’s so fun I bet ta

  59. Riley B

    Riley B

    Πριν μήνα

    Imagine the 2024 moon mission quality

    • sci_pain3

      sci_pain3

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      @W.S K.E bugs bunny isn’t even CGI you played yourself lmao

    • Riley B

      Riley B

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      @W.S K.E shut up

    • W.S K.E

      W.S K.E

      Πριν 2 ημέρες

      more CGI than Bugs Bunny LoL!

  60. dadhie mixie

    dadhie mixie

    Πριν μήνα

    only real moon walk is Michael Jackson

  61. baba BZNZ

    baba BZNZ

    Πριν μήνα

    best movie ever looks so fking real will done hoyllywood

    • dr obnoxius

      dr obnoxius

      Πριν 27 ημέρες

      Thats cause it is real you fucking neanderthal

  62. Kenji

    Kenji

    Πριν μήνα

    huh, i thought there would be more aeiou's, ive also noticed a severe lack of john madden

    • Richard Chicken

      Richard Chicken

      Πριν μήνα

      Here comes another chinese earthquake!

  63. Mr Freemen

    Mr Freemen

    Πριν μήνα

    nice fake

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν μήνα

      Nope, 100% real!

  64. mimik susu

    mimik susu

    Πριν μήνα

    Podo ngomong opo seh...🤔

  65. Lepperkin

    Lepperkin

    Πριν μήνα

    I can't imagine living through that wonderful experience and then having all these people making conspiracies about how it was all faked just so they can feel smart and better than everyone else. it's really sad. The people who managed to make this flight happen spent year perfecting the technology, so why would some random person on facebook seem more convincing? You can literally see space x launch their rockets. When space travel becomes available for anyone with enough money, you are all gonna feel really dumb. Actually, in order to feel right and not like a worthless parasite of the human race, you will pretend like the whole launch and flight is faked, and still back on earth. You will refuse to believe that you could possibly be wrong. I'm done arguing with people over this. Over all my youtube comments I've posted to argue, the best result is that they stop responding because they know they are wrong deep inside, but refuse to admit it, so they just ignore my comments. Imo we should just launch the flat earthers (anti vaxxers too but that's a whole different topic) to the moon without space suits and see how fake it really is. They will be proven wrong AND there's less dumb people to spread their genes around. It's a win win! I might argue in the comments later if I feel like it but as im posting this I haven't slept last night and am gonna have an active day, so I don't necessarily feel like it atm. Seriously, I look at both sides open minded and willing to be proven wrong but It just hasn't happened. You, flat earthers, need to do the same. It will make you look better in the long run.

    • Lepperkin

      Lepperkin

      Πριν μήνα

      @kudz Pakaipa We haven't gone back in 70 years because there wasn't a real reason to. Our political figures didn't feel like doing it. Until recently. We are going back in a few years. The shuttle program didn't try to go to the moon because space shuttles weren't designed to. Their purpose was to transport people to the international space station and I guess fix satellites like the hubble space telescope. I haven't heard about the documentation for flight ops being destroyed, and I don't know fully what that is or if it's true, so I'm not going to answer that one. Finally, we can land on the moon. We have landed numerous probes there in recent years. But humans require alot of resources, and for just going there and back, it doesn't provide nearly enough science or info to make up for the cost of the mission. We didn't know really anything about the moon when the first moon landings happened, and by then we've gathered most of the info we can from a mission lasting a few days then going back to earth, meaning it's just not worth the cost and effort. But now, we are planning to create a permanent colony on the moon, but that requires lots of planning, and multiple factors. We are planning on making a space station that orbits the moon, and settlements on the moon. But that requires alot of planning and it also requires the development of much safer, efficient and reliable rockets. We are also still working out the design of the station, landers, space suits etc. And we aren't using the old ones because those are way less safe, efficient and it's just more crude to use in general. I hope this answers your questions. To sum it up alot of our missions to space only happen because the amount of science gathered outweighs the cost, and nobody wants to spent billions of dollars to discover the same old things

    • kudz Pakaipa

      kudz Pakaipa

      Πριν μήνα

      1. Why havent we gone back in over 70years? 2. Why hasnt anyone else been able to go up there? 3. Did you know the Apollo project cost $30billion in todays dollar. The Shuttle Project which ended 2010, cost a total of $192billion and 20 people dead in launch && re-entry. Why did Shuttle program not attempt to go to the moon? 4. Why was the documentation for flight ops, and other key evidence destroyed? 5. Why cant SpaceX, NASA or any other nation land people on the moon. We can barely make it out of the planet, 95% of space vehicles cannot even land on any surface, and u claim we can land on the moon. Someone help me understand, im just asking thats all.

    • kudz Pakaipa

      kudz Pakaipa

      Πριν μήνα

      well its fake.

    • Jahy sama

      Jahy sama

      Πριν μήνα

      it looks convincing to me

  66. Barber Shop

    Barber Shop

    Πριν μήνα

    It’s a fake, look here the true story: grgone.info/will/nNRje5KipLuNyqs/b-nteo

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν μήνα

      Wow, you have to be _REALLY_ stupid to believe that nonsense!

  67. Rain Malaborbor

    Rain Malaborbor

    Πριν μήνα

    EARTH FLAT

    • predattak

      predattak

      Πριν μήνα

      Nice try kid. Keep trying, you gonna get good someday. Trolling ain't easy.

  68. survivor teknology

    survivor teknology

    Πριν μήνα

    thats why i love america !

  69. Sprocket

    Sprocket

    Πριν μήνα

    www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      @Sprocket You lied. You were called out on your lies. Time to man up, and accept reality. But you won't, will you? You'll run away like a little girl. You are a pathetic troll. Grow up.

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν μήνα

      YOU SAID: "Not our fault you can't compute when someone asks "where are all the stars"... And you spew all smug like "oh it's the exposer" all while tax payers paid 40 billion for the Apollo missions and didn't include one camera capable of taken over exposed shots... Like "golly geez... space is black sometimes maybe we should send up a $500 camera"" YOU SAID: "That's the difference between You and I... I don't wait to be spoonfed information... I go out and get it... " == Good gods, what an idiot. == First of all, you really need to just forget about all of this conspiracy garbage, and go learn to read and write. You are functionally illiterate. And, maybe, in addition to the delusion filter your brain has (which I commented on in my prior reply), perhaps the other reason you don't know anything is because of your illiteracy. People who cannot write very well, cannot read very well. People who cannot read very well, cannot absorb information very well. This is probably contributing to why you know absolutely nothing. Your brain has a triple whammy effect. (1) You have a delusional filter that blocks information you don't want to hear/read. (2) You are functionally illiterate, and this also prevents you from absorbing information. (3) You're an idiot. These three things are not a good combination. == Yes, dummy, they did send the Carruthers camera to do EXACTLY what you think they didn't do. And, yet, you proudly touted that you "go out and get" the information? What? You couldn't Google the Apollo 16 Carruthers camera which took about 125 photos of the stars in UV light? You couldn't Google the Apollo 11/15/17 stellar photography photos? How about just "photos of the stars on Apollo"? No? You don't understand how to find those things? Yet, you proudly say that the difference "between You and I" (sigh, ridiculous grammar, you can't even use the correct pronouns), is that you go out and find things?? Yes, they took plenty of star photos on Apollo. But, no, you won't find stars in the same frame as a properly exposed lunar surface. You cannot capture dim stars in the same photo as a properly exposed lunar surface during the daytime. This is photography 101. Go back and finish high school, you moron. Living your life getting high all the time, being an illiterate high school dropout, isn't going to serve you well. Stop worrying about conspiracies you don't even understand, and complete your basic minimum education. Good gods, what a dummy.

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν μήνα

      1) Your link to the RSimmon composite photoshopped image... you have missed the point entirely (like all of you conspiratards... you also fail to understand the main point). The main point of making that image isn't because they don't have a million other photos of Earth (because, yes, they do). But, the point is that they don't have COLOR-ACCURATE photos of Earth from space. He even tells you that he's doing this to make a COLOR-CORRECT image. See, the problem is, some of the colors, like the greens, get lost through the atmosphere. Continents that are mainly green will sometimes look brownish-pink from deep space, because the greens are often toned down, or lost completely. This is a concept that's very much like underwater photography, where the reds are lost. Do you ever go scuba diving with a camera? Why do the photos all show up with almost no red in them? Why do you have to install a colored lens/filter on the front of your camera to get the reds to show up? Because the red tones don't show up very well under water, that's why. Well, the green tones don't show up very well in space. Therefore, if you want to see the Earth in COLOR-ACCURATE fashion, he has to photo-shop the green tones back into the image, because the greens had been largely lost, or dulled out, going through the atmosphere. I mean, this is part of how delusions work. You literally don't even hear him explaining why he's doing it. You literally block that out of your mind. He explains that he is using Photoshop to put the greens back into the images, and you just refuse to absorb that. Instead, in your conspiracy mind, you think that, for whatever the dumb reason, NASA is admitting that they don't have any photos of Earth that aren't Photoshopped. That's literally what your delusional brain hears, and you ignore the ACTUAL reason that he was Photoshopping that image in the first place. 2) The famous Apollo 17 "Blue Marble" photo is the only "full Earth" photo taken by a person. But, just like above, you truly just don't even understand what is being told to you. Your delusional brain interprets this to mean it's the only photo of Earth taken by a person. Your delusional mind wants to omit the "full Earth" part of the sentence, therefore it does, and you literally don't even absorb those words. That's how badly your delusions have ruined your mind from functioning normally. The phrase "FULL EARTH" is crucial to understanding what they're talking about, but you ignore it. In order to take a full Earth photo, you need to be in between the sun and Earth, at sufficient altitude/distance to get a shot. Yes, there are plenty of times in low Earth orbit where the astronaut is in between the sun and Earth. But, they're way too close to get a full Earth picture. The only time in history that any human has been directly in between the sun and Earth, at a very high altitude/distance, was on Apollo 17. Apollo 17 is the only mission that launched at night (they wanted to time the mission for the purpose of the sun angles on the moon upon landing, and this timing made it best to launch at night). This also happened to have been the timing required that put the capsule in between the sun and Earth after TLI. All of the other missions did their TLI burns, and yes, they could see the Earth, but it was always a "half Earth," or a "3/4 Earth," or whatever, because the astronauts weren't located directly between the Earth and sun. So, like when you look up at the sky and see a half moon, well, it was the same for most of the Apollo missions, and they saw a half Earth, because of the sun angle. Only one mission ever put the capsule in between the sun and Earth, and that was on Apollo 17, and Jack Schmitt took the only "full Earth" photo ever taken by a human. We have millions of "full Earth" photos taken by satellites and stuff. But, again, you have [intentionally] ignored what you're being told about that "Blue Marble" photo, ignoring the entire concept. No, they are not saying that was the only photo of Earth taken by a human. No, they are not saying that was the only "full Earth" photo ever taken. They are saying that the Apollo 17 "Blue Marble" photo was the only FULL EARTH photo taken by a human. All other photos of Earth taken by a human were either PARTIAL Earth photos (due to the sun angles), or were taken from far too close (low orbit) to really be considered a full Earth photo. See, the entire concept is that they wanted to land every Apollo mission in the lunar morning. This, by definition, means that they won't usually see a full Earth. If they saw a "full Earth," then their landing site would be in darkness (basic geometry, go map this out for yourself). But, yes, Apollo 17 got a rare opportunity to see a "full Earth" because of the timing of when the launch took place, and the trajectory it happened to take right after TLI. Bottom line: you don't know what you're talking about, because you have ruined your brain with these stupid conspiracies. You truly prefer your delusions to reality. And, this stuff is quite easily explained if you'd actually pay attention to the words. But, you don't want to. You want to omit the words you don't like, and instead only absorb words that support your delusions.

    • Sprocket

      Sprocket

      Πριν μήνα

      ​@TimReed22222 Still waiting for your seal of assurance that photo is real... You know the "very, very real" one. You want answers. It works both way. Just google earth from space... Enough said. Like a onion, layers upon layers of lies... If you can't get pass one... The hell I'm gonna waste my time with serial naysayer posters.

    • Falcon Heavy

      Falcon Heavy

      Πριν μήνα

      @Sprocket _"while tax payers paid 40 billion for the Apollo missions and didn't include one camera capable of taken over exposed shots"_ They did. Take a look at Apollo 16 Far Ultraviolet Camera/Spectrograph. They took pictures of stars, nebulae, and even galaxies like the Large Magellanic Cloud from the lunar surface. There are also images of stars taken with the Hasselblad with longer exposures.

  70. Idyllic Euphoria

    Idyllic Euphoria

    Πριν μήνα

    "Before we land on the moon, we'd like to thank our sponsor Raid shadow Legends"

    • ItzLexyHere

      ItzLexyHere

      Πριν 9 ημέρες

      lmao

    • sitsia

      sitsia

      Πριν μήνα

      @Yesnoyesno Noyesnoyes true, but it seems like you didn't understand the meaning of this comment..

    • Yesnoyesno Noyesnoyes

      Yesnoyesno Noyesnoyes

      Πριν μήνα

      Raid shadow legends sucks ass

    • noelgonzalez06

      noelgonzalez06

      Πριν μήνα

      😂

  71. Matty Shoxs

    Matty Shoxs

    Πριν μήνα

    where is the stars ..

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      Matty, you can't see stars in the day time. They're standing in bright sunlight. Remember, a day on the Moon is a month. All the missions landed on the daytime side.

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν μήνα

      Too dim to appear in a photograph exposed for daytime bright sunlight.

  72. Mattew Leroy

    Mattew Leroy

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    0:53 What's this music ?????

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      Made for the movie.

  73. stupid S A M I R U

    stupid S A M I R U

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    can anyone explain me please why can't we see stars in the pictures. We should be able to see more stars from moon since moon has no atmosphere.

    • stupid S A M I R U

      stupid S A M I R U

      Πριν μήνα

      @ann onn I got it now. its because sunlight prevents lights from stars to come to the moon. thanks for ur help frnd

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      @stupid S A M I R U No. We can't see stars in the daytime because we are standing in bright sunlight. The astronauts on the Moon were also standing in bright sunlight. It doesn't matter about the atmosphere. The atmosphere makes our daytime sky look blue. There is (almost) no atmosphere on the Moon, therefore the sky looks black. That does not mean it is dark. All the missions took place in the daytime. You cannot see stars in the daytime. It is *that* simple.

    • stupid S A M I R U

      stupid S A M I R U

      Πριν μήνα

      @ann onn i still dont understand .. we cant see stars at day on earth because of earth's atmosphere. but since moon has no atmosphere , we can see stars at day time too there , that's what i heard at least . so if you have a good camera , why couldn't i take pictures of stars there ?

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      @stupid S A M I R U They'd have had to travel thousands of miles to get into the dark part. If you are in America in the day time, you'd have to travel thousands of miles to get to a place where it was night time. Such as, Australia or Africa. Right? The other side of the world. Half of the Moon is dark - night-time, and half is light - day time. Just like the Earth. But unlike Earth, one lunar day lasts for a month. They landed early in the morning of the lunar day - a little after a new Moon, so that it was bright enough to see the landing area, but before it had warmed up too much.

    • stupid S A M I R U

      stupid S A M I R U

      Πριν μήνα

      @ann onn i know that we cant get good pictures facing the sunlight. but if u turn the camera on the other side u couldtake pictures. and in the video the sun was othe side . so explain me this..

  74. CELESTINE KHASATSILI

    CELESTINE KHASATSILI

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    How long did it take from earth to moon?

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν μήνα

      About 3 days.

  75. Claudius Pereira

    Claudius Pereira

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    6:11- VIDEO of Apollo leaving low Earth orbit. 6:19 - Image of Earth very very far away. 6:58 -Image of Earth -rise-looking very small , Earth is FOUR times bigger than moon .Work it out 8 seconds to travel most of distance to moon ! etc.etc.etc.All Apollo spaceships never left Earth . ONE shop photo image of Earth in entire Apollo operation from 1969 to 1972 . ONE - and it was not even a direct photo. You can fool most of the people most of the time -but you cannot fool all the people all the time. Nasa by removing all the critical Apollo videos from You Tube has shown who we are dealing with. Manipulators of facts! WAKE UP people.

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      YOU SAID: "6:11- VIDEO of Apollo leaving low Earth orbit." == Wrong. That's clearly not an Apollo capsule, but a Gemini capsule. And, in the credits, they say the TLI video you're talking about was borrowed from Gemini 8 footage. That's because no Apollo craft ever had any kind of video camera running during TLI, and nowhere useful to put a video camera, even if they did (which they didn't). YOU SAID: "6:19 - Image of Earth very very far away." == Depends on what you mean. How many miles do you consider to be "very very far away"? YOU SAID: "6:58 -Image of Earth -rise-looking very small ," == Do you even know what "Earthrise" photos are?? Good grief. Um, no, that's not an Earthrise photo. Obviously, you have no concept of what that term even means. YOU SAID: "Earth is FOUR times bigger than moon ." == In diameter, yes. Volume, it's more like 50x. But, what's your point? Are you telling me that you don't know how focal length and relative distance to objects in frame are all about? Here, which one is the "real" moon? www.spaceweather.com/swpod2011/20mar11/Paco-Bellido1.jpg thecourseofourseasons.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/crescent-moon-and-venus-8-2012.jpg Guess what, they're both real. I mean, good grief. It seems like you don't even understand how ZOOM works on your camera or something like that. YOU SAID: "Work it out 8 seconds to travel most of distance to moon !" == It took days to get to the moon. What are you talking about? Where are you getting this "8 seconds" nonsense? YOU SAID: "etc.etc.etc.All Apollo spaceships never left Earth ." == You just got done saying the photos were taken from very far away. What ARE you talking about now? YOU SAID: "ONE shop photo image of Earth in entire Apollo operation from 1969 to 1972 . ONE - and it was not even a direct photo." == No. You have misunderstood. There are hundreds of photos of the Earth during Apollo. But, there's only one "full Earth" photo. That's because there was only one time during Apollo that the command module was directly in between the Earth and sun, and that happened on Apollo 17. See, you're not paying attention. A "full Earth" photo is like a "full moon" photo, where the Earth appears as a full ball, rather than just a sliver, or a half, or something like that. It's about the sun angles. The only way you get a "full Earth" photo is by being directly in between the sun and Earth. The other Apollo missions simply never had a trajectory that put them directly between the sun and Earth. But, Apollo 17 launched at night (it was the only mission that did), and it just so happened that this put them in their TLI maneuver at a point in time that would place Apollo directly between the sun and Earth. As usual with you conspiratards, you simply fail to understand the words you're reading. YOU SAID: "You can fool most of the people most of the time -but you cannot fool all the people all the time." == So says the fool. YOU SAID: "Nasa by removing all the critical Apollo videos from You Tube has shown who we are dealing with. Manipulators of facts! WAKE UP people." == Since when does NASA control GRgone? What ARE you talking about? Lots of videos get removed by the owners of their own channels. Sometimes videos are removed by GRgone if they contain copyright violations, and stuff like that. And, hey, dummy, has it ever occurred to you that, perhaps, maybe, just maybe, your favorite conspiracy videos get torn down BECAUSE THEY GET DEBUNKED AND THE POSTERS OF THE VIDEOS TEAR THEM DOWN THEMSELVES IN EMBARRASSMENT? No? That never happens, in your mind? Good grief.

    • NebTheWeb

      NebTheWeb

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @Claudius Pereira said _"ONE shop photo image of Earth in entire Apollo operation from 1969 to 1972 . ONE - and it was not even a direct photo."_ - Wanna bet slick? Just one photo? Lol, here are just a few, from several Apollo flights, taken LONG before CGI, Photoshop, PCs, MACs, Graphics, of any kind were invented. So, here are your photos of earth. As you can see it isn't just one. I've included the photo reference numbers under each photo in case you want to look them up. After you watch this, THEN you can DEEP mine your intergluteal cleft for more excuses. ENJOY!!! grgone.info/will/zZZpj2KygM2jsKM/b-nteo

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      6:11 That's actually footage from one of the Gemini missions (they didn't have TLI footage from Apollo) 6:19 Taken when they were still close to earth. And yes, it's real. 6:58 Nothing wrong there. Go look at the moon next time it's out, it's really quite small from here! "Work it out 8 seconds to travel most of distance to moon ! " Oh, I'm sorry! I didn't realize you were stupid!

  76. bgdecko bg

    bgdecko bg

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Ahahahaha 😂😂😂 it's a good Hollywood production. Americans never went on the Moon. It's simply bullshit.

    • bgdecko bg

      bgdecko bg

      Πριν μήνα

      @Kit Canyon Buddy, you are so stupid and brain-washed. Your goverment did a good job, with your head.

    • bgdecko bg

      bgdecko bg

      Πριν μήνα

      @Kit Canyon You are so brain-washed ☹. I am sorry for you, but really sorry.

    • bgdecko bg

      bgdecko bg

      Πριν μήνα

      @Kit Canyon Jesus... THIS IS A FUCKING F.A.K.E video!

    • bgdecko bg

      bgdecko bg

      Πριν μήνα

      @Kit Canyon 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ you are so fucking stupid...

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν μήνα

      @bgdecko bg Which country?

  77. Just Joe

    Just Joe

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    im glad nasa is gonna pick up the camera man in 2024

    • dr obnoxius

      dr obnoxius

      Πριν 27 ημέρες

      @NebTheWeb you know this is a joke? Right.

    • NebTheWeb

      NebTheWeb

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      No need for one when there is remote control.

  78. Humed Dodiya

    Humed Dodiya

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Fake moon landing . Making fool to us

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      You're doing quite a fine job of making a fool of yourself. NASA didn't need to do anything at all to make you look like a fool.

  79. Dhia Brahem

    Dhia Brahem

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    You gotta give it to americans man , their will to dominate at every aspect of life is insane , I'd dream to have such mentality in my home country

  80. John Rockefeller

    John Rockefeller

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    больше похоже на съёмку в студии)

  81. Ahmed Omar

    Ahmed Omar

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    next time send trump's family

  82. Sarah D

    Sarah D

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    My grandpa worked on the spaceship for the first moon landing. His job was to figure out the actual landing part (calculating the speed vs distance to the surface as they land I think). He is 99 years old now. This was exciting to watch as I think of how exciting it must have been for him to watch each landing.

    • 张林

      张林

      Πριν ημέρα

      Whether he landed on the moon or not, both China and Russia know that he can say yes or no, depending on these two countries.

    • Angga Anggara

      Angga Anggara

      Πριν 4 ημέρες

      Wkwkwkwk....lol..stupid story..nobody trust anymore

    • Biff Tadrickson

      Biff Tadrickson

      Πριν 6 ημέρες

      @ann onn let me help with what I know of. Cordless drills and Velcro. With your internet. Yes well worth 56 million dollars a day

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 6 ημέρες

      @Biff Tadrickson "What have we gained from it?" For one thing, the internet, which you are using right now.

    • Biff Tadrickson

      Biff Tadrickson

      Πριν 10 ημέρες

      I'm glad your grandfather had a job to support his family, many did. I have no doubt craft are built to this day. I've worked myself at place they were built, but that doesn't make where they say they go true. I grew up watching Sesame Street but that didn't mean my teachers were Muppets. Television is the greatest deceiver of mankind. Please don't take this as a way to make fun of your believes. Think about 56 million dollars a DAY. Really other than American pride. What have we gained from it? You and I both can get that in our family. ✌

  83. Rydee Azerien88

    Rydee Azerien88

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Wow thres a wind on the moon wht happen to tha gravity?

    • Stephen Page-Murray

      Stephen Page-Murray

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      No wind, one sixth gravity.

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      WTF are you babbling about? There's no wind & the gravity is just fine.

  84. charles mclaughlin

    charles mclaughlin

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    DID YALL READ NOBODY WANT TO THE MOIN😕😕😕

    • NebTheWeb

      NebTheWeb

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @charles mclaughlin said _"DID YALL READ NOBODY WANT TO THE MOIN"_ - Nobody WANT to the MOIN? Jesus frickin Christ, did you type your comment with your face. emoji man? Try making sense next time because adding illiteracy to your bulging sack of personal fallacies does not support your paper-thin argument, whatever that is.

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      Stupid people have said that. So what?

  85. Yen Fernandez

    Yen Fernandez

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Thz for telling us😊

  86. Avoiding Trees

    Avoiding Trees

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Humble respect from France America. The world now is waiting for you to reach Mars as Europe is still fighting each others.👍

  87. B V Skyfacer

    B V Skyfacer

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    WARNING. ! Incoming idiotic comments by the adherents of the Flat Earth & Magical Dome Cult, and other nincompoops of the Lunatic Fringe.

    • Sprocket

      Sprocket

      Πριν μήνα

      Face it bro. All that Nasa crap is like comics for soyspaceboys. Meant to make a dollar off suckers like yourself.

    • NebTheWeb

      NebTheWeb

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      Yep, one in particular, a KAREN, has been in here polluting the comment section with her constant drivel.

  88. dante dt

    dante dt

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    The whole time they were there sounds like they were trying to prove that they are there. Most of the audio,pictures and videos sound like gathering proof that they were there. Another thing to think about,if they could go to the moon 6 times in the 60s and 70s,how come it’s proving to be much harder to do in almost 50 years with more advanced technology? It’s like saying in the 60s we had cars that could go a hundred 100 miles with one gallon but 50 years only 1 mile.What other technology has gone backwards with the progression of time?Medical,Biotech,Telecommunications,Weapons,Aeronautics etc have improved exponentially but somehow going to the moon has not improved?It doesn’t make sense.

    • dante dt

      dante dt

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @Stephen Page-Murray "Technical training".No,I'm very technically trained as i mentioned above.I think the issue is we're looking at this from different standpoints. You're thinking "how can anybody believe science is a lie?" and i'm looking at from a 'science can be used to lie" mentality.

    • Stephen Page-Murray

      Stephen Page-Murray

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      dante dt Enough. I’m using to dealing with highly qualified professionals. You’re neither. Get a few years technical training and then we can have an intelligent discourse...

    • dante dt

      dante dt

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @Stephen Page-Murray You don't seem to get it.Now you're using "Strange" as if it means anything about the kind of person i am.Let go of the 'smart-guy'and name-calling mentality.

    • Stephen Page-Murray

      Stephen Page-Murray

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      dante dt still haven’t answered my questions. You’re also a very strange person..

    • dante dt

      dante dt

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      ​@Stephen Page-Murray Hahaha!I never said i don't believe in science.I love and enjoy it."Retroreflectors" have nothing to do with the moon landings.They have many applications. Do you think that faking something like that would be so obvious and won't involve real science? The F1,J2 engines are real.The engineers, doctors, astronauts?There were so many equipments that were manufactured to launch the mission.But the thing is launching a rocket and getting to the moon and back are two different things.There's a reason why it has never been 'repeated' by any other country in 50 years.But somehow it was successfully achieved multiple times in the 60s.Some of the equipment did work, but, of course that's part of the deception.You're looking at like "Does this moron/idiot and these dumb people think everything was faked"? That's what i thought when i first came across the idea that they faked the missions.I was thinking about it like a 'scientist' or 'smart guy', until i started thinking about it with a very open mind about governments, politics, money, mass psychology etc.'Everybody' believes in science and that makes it a great tool to deceive people at such a grand scale.Plus the psychological power of TV.

  89. dante dt

    dante dt

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Astronauts saying contradicting statements: grgone.info/will/vcWYhJuFj8-Lmok/b-nteo

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @Falcon Heavy Not with the sun in the FOV, certainly. But maybe with the landscape, LM, etc.; human eyes adapted for looking at those in direct sunlight will not see stars.

    • Falcon Heavy

      Falcon Heavy

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @TimReed22222 I don't think such camera exists to capture stars and the Sun in the same FOV. The Sun is 13 billion times brighter than the next brightest star; Sirius A. It can be possible to capture stars and the lunar surface though with a camera with a wide dynamic range.

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @Falcon Heavy Stars might also be visible to a camera with an extremely wide dynamic range - it would have to be better than human eyes, though.

    • Falcon Heavy

      Falcon Heavy

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @rockethead7 Actually Neil deGrasse Tyson is technically correct. Stars could be visible from the lunar surface as long as the Sun or the lunar surface or any other reflecting surface isn't in your Field of View.

    • dante dt

      dante dt

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      rockethead7 The biggest problem you have is you’re using their version of the story to explain the validity of their story.Of course they would agree,especially to shallowheads like you.Are you gonna be an astronaut and go to Mars when you grow up?Hahaha! I cannot waste my time either.Nothing new,same old stories and excuses.No thinking,just blind following. Let’s talk again in 2030,when the new date for going back to the moon is 2040.Hahaha!

  90. dante dt

    dante dt

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Contradicting reports from astronauts: grgone.info/will/vcWYhJuFj8-Lmok/b-nteo

  91. Shawn Brooks

    Shawn Brooks

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    I'm 48 and this was a little before my time but this is something I wish I'd been around a little earlier for.

  92. Galacticcore 07

    Galacticcore 07

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    It will be brilliant when the Artemus crew touch down onto the moon and live stream the footage back to earth on NASA’s GRgone channel

    • Ivana Killu 101

      Ivana Killu 101

      Πριν μήνα

      cant wait to see the moon in 4k

  93. D.j.

    D.j.

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    All you basterds are Aliens that is why you all never Acknowledge the alien evidence found up there and the true reason why they stopped going up there you alien hybridized ebens nor will you inhabit the world forever or inter into the heavenly realm. "

  94. Riky Perdana

    Riky Perdana

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Haha, nice try..

  95. Oo Deen

    Oo Deen

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    If all the world leaders could just unite -humanity can explore space together as a species instead of funding weaponry on wars. The question is when will we realize that?. That we are all but one species, why cant we just understand one another and when will there be peace. I could rant all day about wars and conflict but we all know that it does nothing but pain and suffering. The BIG picture is space exploration, to see what is out there and we can find the answer to all the questions of our existence.

  96. PUTRA JTS

    PUTRA JTS

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Amazing jokes 😂

  97. NoX Regulator

    NoX Regulator

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    I'm messaging everyone because idk where to go. I'm hoping someone can see what I see. Theres a man on a horse on the moon painted like a cave painting. there is a gigantic hand blessing the man on the horse. grgone.info/will/qLpzrISOpad_paM/b-nteo

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @NoX Regulator You wish to be smacked?

    • NoX Regulator

      NoX Regulator

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @ann onn follow the golden rule. or get smacked.

    • ann onn

      ann onn

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      i.imgur.com/Nf0Fhci.png

    • NoX Regulator

      NoX Regulator

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      btw I believe the technique being used is shadow/abstract art. The intensity of the sun won't let you see. less sun more art. and ann don't tell people what to do. Follow the Golden Rule. Or get smacked.

    • NoX Regulator

      NoX Regulator

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      @ann onn no. and i know what pareidola is. there are to many things right next to each other to be that. I will not accept that. There is a raven a horse a man a hand. cyaaa...

  98. John Smith

    John Smith

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    7:42 Schmitt: 10 seconds. Fuel ullage. We've got ullage. PROCEED on the 99. It took, 2, 1, 0 - Schmitt: IGNITION. IGNITION, Houston. Attitude looks good. Schmitt: ENGINE OVERRIDE is ON, MASTER ARM is OFF. We got a DESCENT QUANTITY light ON at ignition. Mission Control: Challenger, you're GO for landing. Schmitt: Little forward, Gene. ... forward a little. 90 feet. Little forward velocity. 80 feet. Going down at 3. Getting a little dust. You're at 4 - 60 feet. Going down about 2. Very little dust. Very little dust. 40 feet, going down at 3. Cernan: Stand by for touchdown. Schmitt: Stand by. 25 feet, down at 2. Fuel's good. 20 feet. Going down at 2. 10 feet. 10 feet - Schmitt: CO - CONTACT. Schmitt: Stop, push. Engine stop; ENGINE ARM; PROCEED; COMMAND override, OFF; MODE CONTROL, ATT HOLD; PGNS, AUTO. Cernan: Okay, Houston, the Challenger has landed! Mission Control: Roger, Challenger. That's super. Cernan: Boy, you bet it is, Gordo! Schmitt: But we is here; man, is we here. How does that look? Cernan: That looks good. Schmitt: Pressure - pressures look great. Cernan: Houston, you can tell America that Challenger is at Taurus-Littrow.

  99. Peter Lyall

    Peter Lyall

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    Okay there's been a very good movie out called "First Man" about Neil Armstrong history making first walk on the Moon. Now I think it's time one was made about Apollo 17 journey to the Moon and back. I'd go see it for sure. Pete from Australia 🇭🇲

    • rockethead7

      rockethead7

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      In 2014, there was a full length documentary style movie called "The Last Man on the Moon." It didn't use actors and stuff like "First Man" did. But, I didn't exactly like the "First Man" movie anyway, and wouldn't look forward to an Apollo 17 version. Note also: there's a GRgone channel called "Apollo Seventeen" (spelled out) that has almost the entire mission uploaded.

  100. Stella Šestáková

    Stella Šestáková

    Πριν 2 μήνες

    That photo of Earth by person is not real. That person has to be sooo far away totake that picture...

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν μήνα

      @Sprocket The confusion is understandable; there are 2 images that are known as "Blue Marble." There's the quite genuine photograph of earth taken by the Apollo 17 crew in 1972, and the _composite_ image you linked - created in 2002! Of course, a composite image from 2002 has nothing to do with the photograph we all saw in the 70s.

    • Sprocket

      Sprocket

      Πριν μήνα

      @TimReed22222 www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html

    • TimReed22222

      TimReed22222

      Πριν 2 μήνες

      ? You don't think 240,000 miles is far enough? All the pics of earth in this video are real. Get a life.

Επόμενο